Basing her conclusions on interviews with US civilian policy makers, military figures, and non-governmental organization staffers, Mertus (co-director of the Ethics, Peace, and Global Affairs Program; American U.) essentially argues that, while human rights norms matter to all three groups of actors, American exceptionalism has led to a particularist (rather than universalist) approach to human rights, failing to apply human rights doctrines to the United States. However, she suggests, external NGO actors have become increasingly sophisticated in their quest to institutionalize human rights norms. Annotation ©2004 Book News, Inc., Portland, OR (booknews.com)
Read More
It has become routine for the U.S. government to invoke human rights to justify its foreign policy decisions and military ventures. But this human rights talk has not been supported by a human rights walk. Policymakers consistently apply a double standard for human rights norms: one the rest of the world must observe, but which the U.S. can safely ignore.Based on extensive interviews with leading foreign policymakers, military officials, and human rights advocates, Mertus tells the story of how America's attempts to promote human rights abroad have, paradoxically, undermined those rights in other countries. The second edition brings the story up to date, including new sections on the second half of the Bush administration and the Iraq War, and updates on Afghanistan.The first edition of Bait and Switch won the American Political Science Association's 2005 Best Book on Human Rights.
Read Less